Ginny M. Jones - inside out.
  • Home page
  • Politics & Society
  • Religion & Spirituality
  • Reflections
  • Poetry & Verse
  • Echoes...
  • Her Random Thoughts
  • From the Collective
  • The Dark Side
  • Contact

“One Big Beautiful Bill”- Breakdown

6/12/2025

0 Comments

 
Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” (aka the Big Beautiful Bill Act) and who stands to benefit or lose from each provision:

Tax Cuts & Credits

Extends 2017 Trump Tax Cuts (Individual & Corporate)

  • Who benefits: Primarily high earners, corporations, and pass‑through business owners.

    • According to CBO, the extension adds ~$3.7 trillion in tax cuts waysandmeans.house.gov+15pbs.org+15campaignlegal.org+15.

  • Small businesses: Up to 14M owners supported; majority back keeping the pass‑through deduction whitehouse.gov.

  • Middle class: Gets relief, though smaller relative gains compared to the wealthy whitehouse.gov+1npr.org+1.

New deductions

  • No tax on tips & overtime pay

  • Expanded SALT deduction: Raised cap from $10K to $30K–40K, chiefly aiding homeowners in high‑tax states en.wikipedia.org+7en.wikipedia.org+7whitehouse.gov+7.

Child Tax Credit increase & "Trump Accounts"

  • Child Tax Credit: Raised to $2,500 through 2028, then $2,000 en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1.

  • "Trump Accounts": $1,000 starter investment for newborns (2025–28), parents can add $5,000/year. Projections suggest significant growth ($574K by age 60), though advantaged households benefit more time.com+1indiatimes.com+1.

    • Who benefits: All newborns, especially families with ability to contribute.

New 5% tax on remittances

  • Affects immigrant-to-home-country money transfers; potential revenue source
     timesofindia.indiatimes.com+2time.com+2indiatimes.com+2.


Social Safety Net Reforms

SNAP (food stamps)

  • Imposes stricter work requirements for adults aged 55–64 and parents with school‑age children.

  • Shifts large costs to states & cuts ~$295 billion over 10 years—around 3 million fewer users monthly apnews.com+1timesofindia.indiatimes.com+1.

    Who loses: Low‑income individuals and families, elderly, disabled.

Medicaid

  • Tightens eligibility; introduces work requirements early (by end 2026).

  • CBO projects 8.6 million to lose Medicaid by 2034—5.2 million due to work rules theguardian.com+2ourmidland.com+2timesofindia.indiatimes.com+2theguardian.com+5en.wikipedia.org+5fr.wikipedia.org+5.

  • Also cuts ACA subsidies & adds administrative hoops that could reduce enrollment of 24 million nypost.com.

    • Who loses: Low/middle‑income individuals and families.

Immigration & Border

  • Adds 10,000 ICE agents, builds wall, funds detention and mass deportations (up to 1 million per year) apnews.com.

  • Funds flights for deportations, $70 billion toward border/red tape en.wikipedia.org+2apnews.com+2en.wikipedia.org+2.

    • Who benefits: ICE, CBP, defense contractors (e.g., wall/border services firms).

    • Who loses: Unauthorized immigrants; families and advocates opposing enforcement.

Defense & Government

  • Boosts defense spending by $150 billion, including drones, drone boats, and the “Golden Dome” system apnews.com+3en.wikipedia.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3.

    • Who benefits: Pentagon, defense contractors.

  • Judicial contempt limitations: Restricts courts' ability to hold officials in contempt, limiting federal judicial oversight theguardian.com+3campaignlegal.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3.

    • Who benefits: Executive branch/politicians;

    • Who loses: Judicial independence and rule-of-law advocates.

Clean Energy & Environmental Policies

  • Rolls back green‑energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act vox.com+3theguardian.com+3en.wikipedia.org+3.

    • Who loses: Renewable energy companies and environmental initiatives;

    • Who benefits: Traditional energy sectors and taxpayers opposing clean‑energy subsidies.

Fiscal Impact & Debt Ceiling

  • Raises debt ceiling by $4 trillion and removes a $5 trillion Senate cap washingtonpost.com+5theguardian.com+5en.wikipedia.org+5.

  • Adds $2.4–$3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, triggering a credit rating downgrade time.com+15washingtonpost.com+15ft.com+15.

    • Who potentially suffers: All taxpayers (via higher interest costs), future generations, financial markets.

Final Takeaway
​
  • Main beneficiaries: Wealthy individuals, corporations (especially defense), ICE/border services, and executive branch flexibility.

  • Biggest losers: Low-income Americans (SNAP, Medicaid cuts), immigrants, renewable energy sector, and the judicial system.

  • All citizens feel the long-term cost via increased national debt and fiscal vulnerability.
0 Comments

Timeline of Global Control Systems                                Pre-1800's Origins to 2025

6/8/2025

0 Comments

 
Pre-1800s: The Philosophical and Religious Setup     

Panopticon Model (Jeremy Bentham, 1791)


  • Concept for an architecture of control—where individuals are always observed without knowing when.
  • Psychological foundation for modern surveillance systems.
     
Church-State Behavioral Regulation
​
  • Religious institutions used doctrine to shape societal behavior, morality, and submission.
     
Empire Management (Babylon, Egypt, Rome)


  • Use of censuses, taxation, grain control, and spectacles ("bread and circuses") to manage large populations.
     
Occult & Symbolic Knowledge
  • Esoteric societies used hidden knowledge, ritual, and symbolism to exert psychological influence.
​
1800s–Early 1900s | Foundations of Eugenics and Psychological Control

Francis Galton (1883)

  • Introduced eugenics—the belief in controlling genetic quality through breeding and sterilization.

Nikola Tesla’s EM Experiments (1890s)

  • Pioneered resonant frequencies and wireless electricity—laying the groundwork for EM field applications.

Behaviorism: Pavlov & B.F. Skinner

  • Behavior as stimulus-response; used in education, marketing, and military training.

Compulsory Education (Horace Mann, Prussian Model)

  • Mass education systems designed to create obedient, punctual industrial workers.

1920s–1940s | Mass Media Conditioning and Early Implants

Edward Bernays (1928): Propaganda

  • Combined Freud’s psychology with public relations—steering mass opinion using subconscious cues.

Tavistock Institute (Founded 1947)

  • UK-based think tank for social engineering, trauma studies, and media programming strategies.

Nazi Human Experimentation

  • Pioneered unethical testing in medicine, vaccines, and psychological torture—imported into U.S. via Operation Paperclip.

Jose Delgado (1930s–1960s)

  • Conducted brain implant experiments in animals and humans; demonstrated remote control of behavior.

1950s–1999 | MKULTRA, HAARP, Weather Control

Project MKULTRA (1953–1973)

  • CIA experiments on mind control: LSD, EMF, hypnosis, trauma.
  • Included subprojects like Bluebird and Monarch (child programming).

HAARP (1993)

  • High-frequency array capable of ionospheric heating; theorized to affect mood, weather, and communication.

Project Stormfury (1956–1983)

  • Attempted to weaken hurricanes using cloud seeding techniques.

Operation Popeye (Vietnam War, 1967)

  • Extended monsoon seasons via weather manipulation to disrupt enemy supply lines.

Silent Subliminal Presentation System (1992)

  • Patent: US5159703A. Transmits messages below human auditory threshold to influence thought.    Patent Link

Electronic Behavior Control System (1990)

  • Patent: US5356368A. Uses wireless signals to alter mood, emotion, and perception.    Patent Link

2000–2019 | Surveillance Merges with Biotech

DARPA Lifelog → Facebook (2004)
​
  • DARPA canceled a project to collect personal data streams—same year Facebook launched with nearly identical goals.

CRISPR-Cas9 Editing (2012+)

  • Opened pathway to targeted gene editing with programmable nucleases.

DARPA BioDesign (2010)

  • Created synthetic organisms with “kill switches.” Intended for military use.

Mass Smartphone Adoption (2007+)

  • GPS, biometric sensors, and behavior tracking became normalized worldwide.

Silent Talk (DARPA)

  • Brain-computer interface to transmit "pre-speech" thought patterns to remote operators.

2020s–2025 | Convergence of AI, Biotech, and Total Surveillance

mRNA Vaccines Beyond Immunity

  • mRNA platforms now researched for gene expression modulation, memory encoding, and neurogenesis.

CRISPR Integration with AI

  • Patents like AU2025202331A9 show targeted organ-specific delivery of genome-editing tools.    Link

Smart Dust & Nano-Bio Interfaces

  • Invisible MEMS devices track biological, chemical, and EM signals from the body/environment.

P2025069135A – Mobile DNA Readers

  • Portable devices for on-the-spot human DNA analysis, tied to cloud-based tracking.   Patent Link

Digital ID + CBDCs

  • Identity-linked programmable currencies piloted globally (China, Nigeria, EU, IMF). Enable purchase control.

Metamaterial Solar Absorbers

  • Engineered to manipulate incoming solar radiation (geoengineering, weather tampering).
  • Shen et al., 2024 – Metamaterial Absorbers

AI Behavior Tracking

  • Lidar, biosensors, EMF-based positioning systems used in smart cities and workplaces.

Summary

This timeline traces the evolution of control tools across physical, digital, and biological realms—revealing the architecture of modern technocracy that stretches back centuries. Each technological advance has simultaneously been framed as progress while deepening the control grid.


0 Comments

    Author

    Systems are not sacred. They are only as holy as the truth they serve.

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly